




The Washington Post directs your attention to the startlingly comprehensive Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture
project at USC Annenberg. Cataloging over 46,000 references to
fictional journalists in books, print, films, and TV, the IJPC
concludes that print journalists appearing in movies are generally
depicted as beacons of integrity, while TV journalists come across as
sleazebags. Project director Joe Saltzman theorizes this is because
print journalists are mostly abstract figures that readers only
encounter on the page, while TV folk appear in living color, flaws and
all. Hence Scarlett Johannson in Woody Allen's new movie Scoop,
adopting the glasses-make-me-look-smart school of journalist acting.
It's a two-part denial process, though -- we only believe a nubile
young starlet as a hard-working reporter because there are few enough
popularly envisioned print journalists to counteract the fantasy with
pale, doughy, stubbly reality. Then again, there's no reason one can't
envision Scarlett rolling around on a Lebanese beach with CNN mancake Karl Penhaul. Even NYC-local newsgal Jodie Applegate would have to call that cool.
It Pays to Be a Print Journalist -- in Films [WP] [via Romensko]
Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture [Official site]
sarahblooms
says:
That USC webpage looks like it came from 1996.
As for Scarlett, Woody, and those glasses (courtesy of the Sophia Loren collection from 1996), feh. Isn't there always a token hot chick in every workplace? The trouble is believing she's smart enough to write.
Subscribe to comments on this post